Rivers State Emergency Rule: A Chieftain's Take On Tinubu's Decision

Rivers State's Political Tug-of-War: APC Chieftain Speaks Out

In a fiery response to President Bola Tinubu's declaration of emergency rule in Rivers State, Eze Chukwuemeka Eze, a prominent chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC), has voiced his strong opposition. Eze argues that Tinubu's decision overlooks the significant role played by State Assembly members, led by Martin Amaewhule, who thwarted Governor Siminalayi Fubara's attempts to enforce a Supreme Court ruling. This, according to Eze, paints a troubling picture of political bias at the highest level.

Tinubu's Actions Under Scrutiny

Speaking to reporters in Port Harcourt on Wednesday, Eze laid out his concerns in no uncertain terms. He emphasized that the ongoing political turmoil in Rivers State, involving Governor Fubara, the FCT Minister Nyesom Wike, and their loyal assembly members, has been orchestrated by the Tinubu administration. According to Eze, this crisis was deliberately engineered to wrest control of Rivers State, regardless of the means. Eze further contends that the President's actions underscore a long-standing bias, suggesting a calculated move to manipulate the political landscape.

Challenging the Legal Basis of Emergency Rule

Eze pointedly questioned the legal foundation of Tinubu's emergency declaration. He highlighted that Section 305 of the Nigerian Constitution, which the President cited as the basis for his decision, does not provide for the removal or suspension of a democratically elected governor. This raises serious questions about the legality and constitutionality of the President's actions. In essence, Eze argues that Tinubu has overstepped his authority, undermining the democratic process in the process.

Read also:

Michael Herbigs Net Worth 2024 Career Milestones And Wealth Breakdown

Eze went on to draw a comparison with former President Goodluck Jonathan, who, despite declaring states of emergency in terrorist-plagued regions in the northeast, refrained from removing the governors of those states. This restraint, Eze suggests, was rooted in an understanding of the importance of maintaining democratic principles and avoiding political unrest. By contrast, Tinubu's swift action in response to threats to oil facilities, while ignoring widespread violence and humanitarian crises across the country, highlights what Eze sees as misplaced priorities in the federal government.

The Impact on Nigeria's Democracy

Eze's critique extends beyond the immediate political maneuvering in Rivers State. He paints a broader picture of a nation where oil facilities seem to command greater attention than human lives. This, he argues, reflects poorly on Tinubu's leadership and calls into question his commitment to the principles of democracy and justice. At a time when Nigerians are grappling with numerous challenges, from terrorism to hunger, the decision to prioritize oil interests over human welfare is, in Eze's view, both unpatriotic and ill-advised.

Furthermore, Eze expresses disappointment in Tinubu's approach, given his age, experience, and presumed leadership acumen. He had hoped for a more impartial and principled stance from the President, one that would prioritize the nation's well-being over partisan interests. Instead, Eze sees a pattern of bias and manipulation that threatens the very fabric of Nigeria's democracy.

Calling Out the Real Culprits

Eze takes issue with Tinubu's focus on Governor Fubara, arguing that the President has conveniently ignored the role of Nyesom Wike and the 27 defected lawmakers in the political drama. By declaring an emergency rule in Rivers State, Tinubu, in Eze's opinion, has revealed himself as the mastermind behind the crisis. This, Eze contends, not only undermines democracy but also sets a dangerous precedent for future political disputes in Nigeria.

In conclusion, Eze's remarks serve as a stark reminder of the delicate balance between executive power and democratic principles. As Nigeria navigates its complex political landscape, the need for transparency, fairness, and accountability remains as crucial as ever. Tinubu's actions in Rivers State, according to Eze, fall woefully short of these ideals, leaving many Nigerians to question the future of their democracy.